Knitnut.net. Watch my life unravel...
|
Posted by zoom! on December 19, 2009, at 8:23 am |
I like that Christmas Eve feeling, when everything’s finally ready and my home is all warm and clean and cozy and decorated and the presents are wrapped and under the tree and the baking’s done and the house smells good and it’s snowing outside and I finally get to just sit back and have a drink and savor the peacefulness perfection of it all. The calm before the proverbial storm.
At least I like it in theory. In reality, I tend to do procrastinate and do stuff right down to the wire and then say “Okay, that’s good enough.”
This year my goal is to have that kind of warm, cozy Christmas Eve. That means in the next four days I have to clean the house, decorate the house, get a Christmas tree, decorate it, do my Christmas cards, go food shopping, do some baking, do some cooking, buy liquor, finish Christmas shopping and wrap the presents.
Hmmm.
Maybe I’ll skip the cards. And the decorating. And the shopping. And cleaning the house. Maybe I’ll just buy liquor….
So how’s Christmas coming along for you? Are you ready?
Posted by zoom! on December 18, 2009, at 9:20 am |
Here’s a novel use of the Internet. Ottawasteph is “a winner on a losing streak.” She was laid off in July and she and her five cats could be homeless by Christmas unless we help her stave off an impending eviction. She’s 45 years old and has lived in her home for twelve years.
There’s a bit of a twitter campaign going on today to try to help her. Susan Delacourt, Kady O’Malley and Laura Payton have all signed on. I’d never heard of Ottawasteph before today, but after reading her blog and doing a little background research, I’ve decided I like her and I’m convinced she’s legit. I made a small donation and hope some of you will too.
Posted by zoom! on December 17, 2009, at 9:45 am |
Thanks for putting up with my whining yesterday. I’m feeling a little better today. Just admitting it and writing it down seemed to help. And the comments were comforting too. Today I’m back to looking at the bright side, at least intermittently.
Life might not be completely perfect, but I’ve got a lot of good stuff going on.
For starters, the sun is shining insanely out there in the thirty-below-zero-with-the-windchill sky, and my Christmas Cactus is blooming.
Secondly, I don’t have cancer anymore, and I’m in better shape, pain-and-mobility-wise, than I was before the back surgery. So even though I’ve got some lingering health issues, they’re much better than the ones I used to have.
 My yarn basket Third, the financial situation, though a little worrisome, isn’t dire. I’ve got time to figure it out. Even if I lose my house, which isn’t going to happen, I’ve got enough yarn and books to keep me going for at least a couple more years, so I’ll be okay.
Also, I’m in love with someone special who bakes me apple-cranberry muffins and is always up for an adventure or an ice cream cone or adopting lovebirds or writing a novel or whatever wacky idea I come up with.
I’ve got a wonderful son who ends every phone conversation with “I love you Mom.” (And he gave me a gift certificate for Blue Moon Fiber Arts for my birthday. Can you believe that?)
I’ve got a very special giant cat who is crazy about me and never lets me forget it.
And I’ve got all of you.
But wait! There’s more!
 Three skeins of yarn from Wandering Cat Studios My three skeins of luxury yarn were delivered yesterday and they are delicious. Two of them (Forest Floor and Green Onions) are merino/cashmere/nylon; the third (Mermaid’s Tail) is merino/alpaca lace They’re from the local Wandering Cat Studios‘ Etsy shop. There was a special cat birthday celebration going on over there, so there was free shipping and a contest and (insert drum roll here) I WON the contest! I don’t know what I won yet, but I’m excited. I hardly ever win stuff. One time about 30 years ago I won the grand prize at an Icelandic Christmas party: it was a flexible pencil. (I so rarely win stuff, it makes a permanent impression on me when I do.)
 Wake up Duncan, there's new yarn! Okay, gotta run. I’ve got some real work and a real deadline, and I’m having an MRI this morning too. They want to get a better look at the thing they’re pretty sure is a fibroid in my uterus. (Before this year, I’d never had an MRI. This will be my sixth one!)
I hope the sun is shining wherever you are today too.
 Canadian Blog Awards: Vote The final round of voting is now taking place on the 2009 Canadian Blog Awards. You can vote for Knitnut.net in two categories: Best Blog Post and Best Personal Blog.
Posted by zoom! on December 16, 2009, at 7:50 am |
Whining Advisory: The following paragraphs contain whining. Lots of it.
Lately I’ve been feeling a little down. It’s like I haven’t got enough energy to feel good. You know how sometimes you take the stairs two at a time without even noticing, and other times you’re acutely aware of your own gravity as you trudge up each step? Well, I’m trudging.
I want my old body back. The one I had a year ago. The one that walked everywhere and felt good and didn’t hurt. Physically I feel like I’ve aged about ten years in 2009. I can’t even touch my toes anymore. I can barely bend. Blech.
I had let myself believe 2009 was going to be a self-contained bad-health year. The year of breast cancer and back surgery. It wasn’t supposed to spill over into 2010. But now it looks like some of my health problems might be chronic. As in forever. I’m trying to wrap my head around that. I’m pretty good in a crisis. But chronic pain? It’s a different emotional ballgame and I’m struggling with it.
Also, there’s some stuff going on that I can’t really blog about because it’s not just about me, it’s about other people too. But it’s kind of ugly, and thinking about it hasn’t been much fun.
The worst part is I feel like I’ve lost my sense of humour, which is the number one tool in my Personal Coping Toolkit.
And winter. Blech. I don’t like it. It’s cold and nasty and expensive and it makes my body contort in self-defense.
I’m not sleeping well either. Some of it is due to side effects of medications Some of it is due to Duncan. You know how Duncan has always been so wonderful to sleep with, like a big cuddly teddy bear? Lately not so much. He’s been too needy, and too kneady too. He wants to fall asleep with his paws rhythmically kneading my face. I don’t like it. It hurts. But the more I don’t like it, the needier he gets. And Duncan’s a very persistent cat.
I’m a little worried about money too. For the past 19 years I’ve gotten used to always having some money in the bank. I got a severance package when I was laid off, but for nine months now there’s only been money going out of my bank account, none going in, and it’s getting a little thin now. I feel like a cat who can see the bottom of his food dish. I can see the bottom of my bank account, and I don’t like it.
I know this doesn’t make any sense, but I dealt with it by buying three skeins of yarn and two books. Gorgeous yarn. Coveted books.
Sigh.
Okay, that’s it for my whining. Your turn!
Posted by zoom! on December 15, 2009, at 9:08 am |
It was a year ago today that the Bank Street Bully incident happened. The ensuing police investigation fizzled out and, as far as I can tell, there were no real consequences to Constable Eric Post.
But I like to think that the blog post was a consequence. The story got around. And now, one year later, Bank Street Bully has advanced to the final round of voting in the Best Blog Post category of the Canadian Blog Awards. I think a little poetic justice would be served if it won Best Blog Post, don’t you? (Vote for Best Blog Post here.)
Also, Knitnut.net has advanced to the final round of voting in Best Personal Blog! Thanks so much to all of you who voted. There are ten blogs on the short list, and I would love it if you would go check them out, and vote, one last time. (Vote for Best Personal Blog here.)
I was thrilled to see that Robin Kelsey’s blog, Watawa Life, is on the short list for Best Photo/Art blog. And Milan’s blog, A Sibilant Intake of Breath, is poised to win Best Science/Technology blog. Turtlehead and Postcards from the Mothership both advanced in the Family category. Apt. 613 and the Mindful Merchant have a shot at Best New Blog. (Did I miss any local blogs?)
There were a few disappointments too, as some of my favourite blogs didn’t advance to the finals. But some of the categories were HUGE this year – there was a lot of competition. And the voting system was kind of wonky.
You can peruse all the nominated blogs and vote here. My understanding is that you can vote daily. (Or perhaps even more frequently, if you’re so inclined. The voting system’s still kind of wonky.)
Posted by zoom! on December 14, 2009, at 11:07 am |
A few days ago I promised to tell you all about my experience as a welfare cheat. Julia, who is a lawyer, informs me there’s no statute of limitations on this, so I’ve invited a friend we’ll call Zoey to do a guest post about her experiences as a welfare cheat.
Zoey’s Story
I was a single mom on welfare for about seven years. I spent most of that time in school, finishing high school and getting a university degree. (This was back in the 80s, before it was a crime to collect student loans and social assistance at the same time.)
I sometimes found myself tiptoeing around the edges of the rules. In fact, I didn’t even know for sure what the rules were, but I didn’t want to draw attention to myself by asking my welfare worker, who scared the bejeezus out of me. For example, I didn’t know if I was allowed to work, and if so, how much I could earn before they started deducting it from my welfare cheque.
I never had a job job while I was on welfare, but I did occasionally earn a little extra income. For a few months, I babysat a little boy on Wednesday afternoons. I typed essays for students. (Such an outdated concept now, typing. I got paid a buck or two a page.) I cleaned the common areas of my apartment building for a small reduction in rent.
Welfare fraud, all of it.
I knew someone who bought groceries for his daughter when she was on welfare with two small children. The daughter did not report the gift of the groceries to her welfare worker.
That, too, is welfare fraud.
I believe the welfare system compels people to cheat. It forces them to live on so little money and to endure such constant stress on account of it, that they must cheat in small ways just to survive. It’s like telling someone not to breathe more than three times a minute. They might try to comply, but eventually they’re going to start sneaking a few extra breaths because they need them.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: you can make a lot of life’s problems go away by throwing money at them, but when you’re on welfare, there’s no money to throw. Problems just keep piling up. You can’t afford to ever make a mistake or ever have bad luck. You can’t afford for anything to ever go wrong. And life, unfortunately, is just not like that. Especially when you’re poor.
So one day your neighbour stops you on the street and asks you if you would consider babysitting her toddler one afternoon a week while she takes her older child to his music lessons, and she’ll pay you $10 each time. That’s a lot of money to someone in your circumstances, and while it might not be legal, working seems like such a victimless crime in the grand scheme of things. (Work’s a weird thing when you’re on welfare. On the one hand, if you don’t work you have the stigma of the lazy welfare bum stereotype. But on the other hand, if you DO work, you have the stigma of the welfare cheat stereotype. You can’t win.)
You decide to take the babysitting job. You make your $10 a week, but live in perpetual fear of getting caught. (Nowadays they even have special snitch lines set up to catch welfare cheats like you.)
My theory is that impossibly low rates of social assistance (about $600/month for a single employable person in Ontario) serve as a way of controlling the poor. There’s a great deal of surveillance of welfare recipients. Many people on welfare live in fear of biting the hand that feeds them. They’re walking on eggshells. They are afraid of their welfare workers. They are afraid of standing up, en masse, and getting angry. They are especially afraid of all this if they are cheating. I suspect that extremely low welfare rates result in extremely high rates of low-level cheating, such as the type I was guilty of. This creates an environment where the most marginalized element of society – which is potentially an angry group with very little to lose – is effectively silenced and disempowered.
Posted by zoom! on December 13, 2009, at 10:48 pm |
 Mayor Larry handing out trinkets GC and I went to Mayor Larry’s Christmas Party at the Cattle Castle today. Larry was positively beaming. Seriously. Ear-to-ear perma-grin. He was totally in his element, basking in his own glow.
He kind of shook hands with me – it was a cross between a handshake and a high five. It was a little awkward.
We got free Beaver Tails and a Clementine orange and coffee. If we’d been younger, we’d have gotten free flashlights too.
I heard today that he’s thinking about not running in the next election. I don’t think it’ll make any difference to the outcome, but I guess it’s a more graceful exit strategy than getting excoriated in the polls.
 Red Stilts
 Mrs. Claus reading to the little ones
 The only known photograph of me and Mayor Larry
Posted by Zoom! on December 12, 2009, at 9:08 am |
I went to see the neurosurgeon on Thursday for my post-operative checkup.
I like Dr. Lesiuk. I like him as a person, and as a doctor. He showed me my MRI on the screen and explained what was going on in my spine.
There are two reasons I’m still in pain. One is scar tissue, and the other is that the same disk has herniated further since the surgery. He doesn’t want to operate again, at least not right away, because while surgery would help with the herniation, it would likely cause more scarring. So…the plan is to wait and see. Some of the problem might resolve on its own in a couple of months. If not, we’ll look at other options, like spinal injections.
I asked him about exercise. He said only low-impact stuff, but not to push it. Listen to my body, take it easy, don’t overdo it, don’t push through pain.
Which means I’ve been overdoing it. I’ve been pushing through pain while walking.
I stopped taking prescription painkillers a couple of weeks ago, but I’m still taking anti-inflammatories (Arthrotec) for the pain. The combination of painkillers and anti-inflammatories did control the pain almost completely, but it had its drawbacks. It was expensive, hard on the digestive system, and I was more likely to further injure myself because my brain wasn’t receiving pain signals when I was pushing too hard. Which is kind of a weird concept…is the pain still there if you can’t feel it?
I’m disappointed that the surgery didn’t cure me, but I’m grateful for the fact that it did help. Last night GC and I went to Lee Valley Tools, and my leg was hurting. But then GC reminded me that the last time we were at Lee Valley Tools, back in July, I was in excruciating pain. I’m happy to just be in plain old non-excruciating pain now.
That’s about all the news on the back front.
What else have I got? Just some random stuff.
-
We went to the Hit & Run show at Le Petite Mort Gallery last night, and saw an original Astronaut Love Triangle piece! That was kind of thrilling.
-
Winter didn’t mess around this year. It waited til the last minute and then swooped down like it meant business. I like this new approach.
-
I’ve been doing some contract work which has been keeping me pretty busy the last couple weeks. I like working at home. I need more contract work so I can keep working at home.
-
I’m reading The Book Thief. I’m knitting a sock. I baked Blueberry Cinnamon muffins.
-
Every year at this time the boxes of tiny, easily peeled seedless oranges appear in the grocery stores and I can never remember which are better, the Clementines or the Mandarins. This year I’m recording it here for Future Zoom. The Mandarins are definitely better. Much, much better. Buy the Mandarins.
Posted by Zoom! on December 11, 2009, at 9:58 am |
The Conservatives are trying to take the war on drug users to another level with Bill C-15, which proposes mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses.
This Bill, if passed into law, will strip judges of their discretion in sentencing Canadians convicted of drug offenses. Rather than being allowed to take all factors into consideration before making a sentencing decision, judges will have no choice but to impose prescribed sentences. This will result in a sudden and ongoing surge of new prisoners, leaving us with no choice but to construct more prisons to accommodate them all, at great expense to ourselves.
The crazy thing about us adopting this approach to drugs is that we already know it will fail. The United States brought in mandatory minimum sentences in the mid-80s. They continue to spend a fortune on it, and the evidence continues to show it doesn’t work. One of every hundred Americans is now incarcerated in prison or jail, and one in 33 is under some form of correctional control such as probation or parole. A huge proportion of incarcerated Americans are there for using drugs, including marijuana. The US spends more on corrections than any other industrialized country, and what does it have to show for it? More incarcerated citizens than any other industrialized country in the world. More children growing up with incarcerated parents. High crime rates. No reduction in drug use.
The United States has shown us, by example, that mandatory minimum sentences, as a strategy for dealing with drug use, is an extremely expensive unmitigated failure. And that’s exactly what Harper’s Conservatives are trying to force us to emulate.
It costs between $88,000 and $250,000 to keep someone in prison for a year in Canada. And that doesn’t even begin to look at the hidden costs, such as job loss, foregone income taxes, family breakdown and child welfare costs.
Judges already have ample power to incarcerate drug offenders when circumstances warrant it. We don’t need legislation that strips them of their discretion and forces them to imprison people, regardless of circumstances. Such legislation would be regressive, ineffective, expensive and driven by conservative ideology rather than evidence.
So the obvious question is “Why are the Conservatives trying to get Bill C-15 passed, then, if it’s doomed to fail and is going to cost a lot of money?”
It’s not because they’re stupid; It’s because they think we are. The Conservatives like things that can be reduced to extremely simple, easily digestible slogans that will resonate with people who don’t think. Like this: War on Drugs. Tough on Crime. Zero Tolerance. They’re going for the votes of non-thinking Canadians, and they’re counting on them being the majority of voters. They might be right; I hope not.
It’s not too late to stop Bill C-15. Contact your MP. Contact these Senators:
David Angus |
anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca |
George Baker |
bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Tommy Banks |
gautj@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Larry Campbell |
campbel@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Joan Fraser |
frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Serge Joyal |
joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Lorna Milne |
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Pierre Claude Nolin |
nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Jean-Claude Rivest |
jcrivest@sen.parl.gc.ca |
John Wallace |
wallaj@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Charlie Watt |
wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca |
Posted by Zoom! on December 10, 2009, at 11:15 am |
They’re calling it welfare abuse, and they’re accusing doctors of it.
Doctors can help nudge up the incomes of their welfare-dependent patients by completing a form that entitles them to some extra food money each month for health-related reasons. It’s called the Special Dietary Allowance. There are a number of qualifying health conditions, such as diabetes, Crohn’s Disease, Celiacs, HIV, vitamin deficiencies and food allergies. The more such conditions a person has, the larger their food supplement will be, up to a maximum of $250 a month.
A few years ago, the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP) urged social assistance recipients to ask their doctors to complete the forms, regardless of their health status, as a strategy to address Ontario’s woefully inadequate welfare rates.
A number of doctors have completed the forms for patients who do not have the listed conditions, presumably because they see a nutritious diet as good preventive health care, and because they know it is virtually impossible for someone to eat a nutritious diet on a welfare income. You can get enough calories, but not enough nutrition. Same thing with the food banks and the soup kitchens: plenty of calories, not many fruits and vegetables.
According to the incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association, Dr. Jeffrey Turnbull, poverty is the single greatest predictor of poor health in Canada. It’s associated with higher levels of chronic illness, infant mortality, stress, depression and disability…and that’s just scratching the surface.
If you are a single employable person receiving Ontario Works (welfare) , you live in extreme poverty. Your total annual income is $7,204* (including federal and provincial tax credits), or $600 a month. That’s about one-third of the poverty line. In other words, you can have one-third of what you need and none of what you want. It’s amazing what you will consider a luxury under such circumstances.
I’ve been on welfare and I can’t even fathom how people do it. Gabriel wrote about eating on welfare very compellingly in his blog post: The More Things Stay the Same the More They Continue to Suck but in a Totally Bad Way.
Anyway, it’s a pretty sad day when doctors are being accused of welfare abuse for signing forms that might get their patients some fresh fruits and vegetables. Doctors shouldn’t be put in this position in the first place, of having to intervene to ensure their patients’ access to adequate nutrition. Welfare incomes should be sufficient to cover basic nutrition for all recipients, not just for those who are already sick. Instead of going after doctors and other so-called ‘welfare abusers,’ the government should immediately raise the rates to a livable level. Nobody should ever have to scam fresh fruit. Nobody.
Speaking of welfare abuse, one of these days I’m going to blog about my own experiences of being a welfare cheat. I hope the statute of limitations is up.
*That’s the 2007 welfare rate, according to the National Council of Welfare. I don’t know if it’s changed since then, but it likely hasn’t changed much. The only time welfare rates change dramatically is when they are slashed.
|
|
Popular Posts